Layla Hughes and Paula Lane describe the implications of restraint procedure in intellectual disability practice in Ireland, and how policy changes affect nurses
This article explores the ethicolegal and political factors associated with physical restraint in intellectual disability practice in Ireland.
The primary purpose of physical restraint in intellectual disability care is to prevent injury or harm to the service user or others, yet research evidence shows it can cause trauma and injury. Physical restraint is a controversial topic and it is important for nurses to remain up to date with clinical governance strategies, regulation and policy developments.
In recent years, there has been debate regarding the use and misuse of the restrictive practice of physical restraint, particularly in care settings where vulnerable clients reside. In intellectual disability services, nurses face difficult decisions in caring for clients when managing challenging behaviour.
The protection and safety of the service user is of utmost importance and includes: legal considerations regarding professional duty of care and consent; political matters of advocacy and power; human rights; and ethical principles.
Ethics require a moral approach that ‘first does no harm’, engaging in beneficial practices that serve to uphold the best interests of service users and engender public trust.
Learning Disability Practice. 19, 4, 23-27. doi: 10.7748/ldp.19.4.23.s21
Correspondence Peer reviewThis article has been subject to double-blind review and has been checked using antiplagiarism software
Conflict of interestNone declared
Received: 07 December 2015
Accepted: 27 January 2016
or
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more