• To recognise the importance of undertaking a psychosocial assessment with children and young people who present to the ED with mental health issues
• To familiarise yourself with some commonly used psychosocial assessment tools for this patient cohort
• To consider inclusion of a psychosocial assessment template into ED documentation, supported by staff training, may increase adherence to the use of such tools by ED staff
Referrals to mental health services, and mental health-related presentations to emergency departments (EDs), among children and young people (CYP) have increased over the last decade. In the UK, national guidelines and standards recommend that CYP who present to an ED with mental health issues should receive a psychosocial assessment, while evidence suggests that the use of a psychosocial assessment tool can enhance the management of this patient cohort. However, it can be challenging for ED healthcare professionals to undertake a formal psychosocial assessment due to a range of factors.
This article reports the results of a service evaluation, undertaken in two children’s EDs in a large NHS trust in England. The evaluation involved a review of 308 ED clinical records of CYP who presented to the EDs with mental health issues, to assess the extent to which this cohort was receiving a structured psychosocial assessment. The results showed that only a small proportion (34%, n=104) of the clinical records contained evidence of some form of psychosocial assessment, while the use of a psychosocial assessment tool was documented in only 22 (7%) of these 104 clinical records. The results have informed a wider quality improvement project to enhance practice in this area.
Emergency Nurse. doi: 10.7748/en.2024.e2214
Peer reviewThis article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software
Correspondence Conflict of interestNone declared
Doherty HL (2024) Improving psychosocial assessment of children and young people in the emergency department: a service evaluation. doi: 10.7748/en.2024.e2214
AcknowledgementThe author would like to thank Harbinder Sandhu, professor of health psychology, for her invaluable guidance and support
Published online: 19 November 2024
or
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more