Emergency Nurse. 26, 1, 37-42. doi: 10.7748/en.2018.e1623
Correspondence Peer reviewThis article has been subject to double blind peer review
Conflict of interestNone declared
This article has been subject to external double-blind review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software
PermissionTo reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com
Write for usFor information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com
For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/writeforus
RevalidationPrepare for revalidation: read this CPD article, answer the questionnaire and write a reflective account.
For more information, go to rcni.com/revalidation
Keywords :
or
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more