Living with chronic pain: the patient’s perspective
Greti McHugh Research Fellow, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, University of Manchester
Gavin Thoms Consultant Anaesthetist, Evaluation and Audit Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester Royal Infirmary
Aim The aim of this study is to investigate patients’ perceptions and experiences of chronic pain management before and after attending pain services.
Method A sample of 245 patients with chronic pain, who attended specialist pain services in 11 UK hospitals, were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Patients’ ages ranged between 23 and 86 years (median 51 years), and the duration of pain ranged between six months and 57 years (median five years).
Results Patients reported that pain had had a profound effect on their lives, restricting daily living and leisure activities. 33 per cent (81) were classified as medically disabled. Patients’ perceptions and attitudes to the management of chronic pain varied. Their main concern was that, although they wanted a specific diagnosis, they were often not given a reason for their chronic pain.
Conclusion Pain management requires a significant amount of input by health professionals. Patients wanted advice on the best techniques to help them cope with chronic pain. Most patients had previously tried many different pain treatments to obtain short-term pain relief. One third of patients had waited up to four months for their initial pain assessment at the pain service. Once referred to specialist pain services, patients were satisfied with their care. Almost half (47 per cent, 115) of the interviewees reported that their pain had improved. As chronic pain has a profound effect on patients’ lives, it is important that early diagnosis, treatment and referral to appropriate specialists is given high priority. This study has raised the awareness and understanding of an important, but often misunderstood area.
Nursing Standard.
15, 52, 33-37.
doi: 10.7748/ns2001.09.15.52.33.c3082
Correspondence
gretl.mchugh@man.ac.uk
Peer review
This article has been subject to double blind peer review
Want to read more?
Already have access? Log in
or
3-month trial offer for £5.25/month
Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
- Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
- RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
- NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
- Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
- A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days.
Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more